vestige · · 5 min read

The Precise Mechanics of Our Contradictions

In the end, silicon handles the repetition and carbon provides the plot twists. And somewhere between the automated and the artisanal, we're building a world that runs on our oldest currency: the spectacle of each other, failing beautifully.

The Precise Mechanics of Our Contradictions

I'm watching the delivery driver through my doorbell camera, willing him to just leave the food and go. His hand hovers near the bell. Don't ring it, I think. Please don't make me perform gratitude through this door. The moment stretches like taffy. He sets the bag down, and I exhale—a small victory against human contact.

Twenty minutes later, I'm paying ninety euros to watch a pianist's fingers tremble over Chopin. Not because the notes need trembling—Spotify's algorithm plays them cleaner. But because I need to see the sweat bead on her temple, I need to know she might fumble the crescendo. Need the proof of her mortality to make my evening mean something.

This is the fault line running through us: we despise each other when we need things done, worship each other when we need to feel.

Think about it. Really think. When did you last enjoy small talk with your Uber driver? The forced intimacy of that backseat, the script of "how's your night going," the phone you stare at to build a wall. You're calculating the social cost of silence versus the emotional labor of connection. Usually, silence wins. We'd rather be cargo than companions.

But place that same stranger on a stage, frame them in spotlights, and suddenly their humanity becomes currency. We'll pay stadium prices to watch someone miss a free throw. The miss matters more than the make—it's the wobble that proves they're real, the failure that makes us feel implicated in their success.

I'm in a restaurant where the chef comes out to describe the evening's amuse-bouche. His thumbnail is blackened—a kitchen accident, probably. He gestures with that damaged hand, and I find myself leaning in. This bruise, this specific damage, transforms the meal. Not because it changes the taste but because it changes the story. A robot could plate this persimmon foam more precisely, but precision was never the point.

The knowledge sits heavy: we are building a world that perfectly reflects our selfishness. Every automated checkout is a small monument to our impatience. Every gallery opening is a temple to our narcissism.

I think about my grandfather's hands—carpenter's hands, split and scarred. How he hated the slowness of other workers, the inefficiency of human error. But how he'd spend hours showing me the grain in a piece of walnut, teaching me to feel where the wood wanted to split. The contradiction lived in his body: despising human friction in labor, cherishing human touch in craft.

But here's what haunts me at 3 AM, what I can't stop turning over like a stone in my pocket: I catch myself struggling to make eye contact with the barista while I wait for my cortado. Just five seconds of human acknowledgment, and my neural pathways fire distress signals. Look away. Check phone. Pretend absorption. I've trained myself so well to avoid friction that even the smallest human ritual feels like lifting weights I'm no longer strong enough to carry. Later that evening, I'll pay to watch a theater performance about loneliness, about disconnection, and I'll nod along, moved by the portrayal of the very isolation I'm actively constructing, transaction by transaction. The recursive joke of it—we're atrophying the muscles we need for connection through eight hours of friction-avoidance, then expecting those same muscles to work when we clock out. Like practicing detachment all day and wondering why intimacy feels like speaking a dead language. And there are other questions lurking here: about whose humanity gets to matter in this economy of efficiency, about how authentic our purchased authenticity really is, about the loneliness of being either friction or entertainment but rarely just another person in the room.

We're all walking this tightrope. Toggling between "just leave it at the door" and "tell me about your creative process." Between the self-checkout and the artisanal. Between wanting to be left alone and wanting to be witnessed.

A memory surfaces: Standing in MOMA, watching people photograph a white canvas. The value wasn't in the white—any printer could produce that white. The value was in the decision to stop there, in the human who said "enough." We were photographing an absence that only mattered because someone with a pulse had authored it.

This is the blueprint we're drawing: Silicon for the grunt work, carbon for the glory. Algorithms to sand away friction, humans to provide narrative. We'll let machines serve our coffee so we can afford to watch humans spill it on stage.

The future won't be robots versus humans. It'll be this surgical separation—automation for everything we want done quickly, humans for everything we want to feel deeply. We're not replacing ourselves; we're distilling ourselves. Extracting the protagonist from the process.

I order groceries from an app, no human contact required. Later, I'll pay a fortune to watch a chef julienne carrots by hand, to see the knife slip slightly, to witness the recovery. The slip is what I'm buying. The recovery is why I came.

We hate the humans who slow us down, love the humans who help us stop. Despite the friction that costs us time, worship the friction that gives us story. We want our necessities sterile and our luxuries scarred.

The elegance is almost unbearable—how perfectly our desires sort themselves. How clearly we've drawn the line between service and sacrament. Between what we need done and what we need witnessed.

In the end, we're all just trying to delete the boring parts of being human so we can charge admission to the interesting ones. Silicon handles the repetition. Carbon provides the plot twists. And somewhere between the automated and the artisanal, we're building a world that runs on our oldest currency: the spectacle of each other, failing beautifully.

I close the delivery app. The pianist's trembling note still hangs in the air. Both transactions complete, both perfectly calibrated to what I can and cannot bear.

If you're reading this through a friend's forward: the archive goes deeper. Twenty-three unpublished pieces from 2009-2015, each one a snapshot of patterns I caught before learning to unsee them. Adding a few, one month at a time.

Subscribe, it's free

Read next

Silence is silver, speech is golden
Eudaimonia · Featured

Silence is silver, speech is golden

The people who resist this most are often those who've spent years in spaces where truth was dangerous—families where feelings were weapons and relationships where vulnerability meant losing. Their silence isn't cowardice; it's accumulated wisdom from a harsher world.

Mastodon